Essays Without the Noise

These essays are written with one goal in mind: more signal, less noise. Here you will find historical perspective, medical and policy analysis, and measured commentary on the presidency, healthcare, medicine, and public life—written to illuminate rather than inflame.

Understanding the Affordable Care Act, Part 5: Alternative Funding Plans
Medicine and Public Policy Paul G. Schmitz, M.D. Medicine and Public Policy Paul G. Schmitz, M.D.

Understanding the Affordable Care Act, Part 5: Alternative Funding Plans

The ACA funding debate is not simply about whether subsidies should continue. It is about who bears the financial risk when healthcare costs rise: patients, taxpayers, states, insurers, employers, or the federal government. As enhanced premium tax credits expire, Congress faces competing choices—restore subsidies, modify them, redirect support through HSAs, expand state flexibility, or use practical tools like reinsurance to stabilize premiums. None is free. Each shift costs and risks in a different direction.

Read More
Understanding the Affordable Care Act, Part 3: Who Pays for the ACA?
Medicine and Public Policy Paul G. Schmitz, M.D. Medicine and Public Policy Paul G. Schmitz, M.D.

Understanding the Affordable Care Act, Part 3: Who Pays for the ACA?

How is the Affordable Care Act actually funded? Part 3 of this series looks at the dollars behind the law: federal spending, taxes and fees, subsidies, Medicaid expansion, and the budget tradeoffs that continue to shape the ACA’s future. The goal is not rhetoric, but clarity—how the money flows, who benefits, and why the funding debate remains central to health policy.

Read More